top of page
Search

WHAT ARE SOCIAL COMMERCE CONSTRUCTS AND WHY THEY MATTER

  • Writer: Raffles Jakarta
    Raffles Jakarta
  • Nov 17, 2025
  • 5 min read

Social commerce has swiftly evolved from a niche concept into a defining force in modern digital markets. Platforms such as Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, and Xiaohongshu are no longer just spaces for social interaction; they are sophisticated commercial ecosystems where social dynamics, platform design, and psychological signals shape consumer decisions. Understanding social commerce constructs is essential because these underlying mechanisms determine how consumers behave, how Trust is formed, and how brands achieve meaningful engagement in today’s rapidly evolving digital landscape.

 

At its core, social commerce operates on several foundational constructs, elements that combine technology, social interaction, and human motivation. These constructs are not abstract theories; they influence every stage of the consumer journey, from discovery to validation and purchase.

One of the most essential constructs is Sociability, the social interaction that occurs naturally on digital platforms. When users like, comment, share, or engage with content, they create visible signals of interest. These cues help other users assess a product’s relevance and credibility. Sociability transforms the shopping experience from isolated browsing to a collective activity, where opinions, discussions, and peer recommendations directly influence buying intentions.

 

Another central construct is Trust, the psychological assurance that makes consumers feel confident making purchases without physically inspecting products. Social commerce platforms embed multiple layers of Trust through influencer endorsements, user-generated content, community discussions, and transparent reviews. When Trust is high, consumers feel safer committing to online transactions, even across borders or unfamiliar brands. Equally significant is Information Quality, which encompasses clarity, accuracy, relevance, and depth. On platforms where users seek instant answers and visual demonstrations, incomplete or misleading information decreases consumer confidence. High-quality information, clear product videos, detailed descriptions, and authentic testimonials enable consumers to evaluate and compare options quickly, thereby increasing both satisfaction and conversion.

 

Perceived Usefulness further shapes consumer motivation. When platforms streamline decision-making or offer convenience, such as shoppable links, one-tap checkout, or personalized recommendations, users view social commerce as a functional and efficient way to shop. This perception directly strengthens purchase intention. Another influential construct is Perceived Enjoyment, which explains why social commerce is often more effective than traditional e-commerce. Users do not come to social platforms solely to shop; they come to be entertained, inspired, or emotionally stimulated. The blend of entertainment and shopping makes the experience pleasurable, reducing resistance to commercial messages. As a result, enjoyable interactions contribute to impulse purchases and stronger brand affinity.

 

Alongside these human-centered constructs, Task–Technology Fit plays a critical structural role. When a platform’s features support the tasks users want to complete, finding inspiration, comparing options, interacting with sellers, or making payments, the experience feels seamless. Instagram’s product tags, TikTok Shop’s integrated checkout, and Facebook Marketplace’s messaging functions are examples of strong alignment between user needs and platform capabilities. The better the fit, the stronger the adoption and continued use.

These constructs work together in a dynamic ecosystem where consumer decisions emerge from social influence, technical design, and psychological comfort. This is why understanding them is crucial for brands, creators, and marketers. Social commerce is not driven solely by product quality or price competitiveness; it is shaped by how well platforms activate and integrate these constructs to support the consumer journey. Armed with this knowledge, brands can strategically design their social commerce experiences to engage consumers effectively.

 

In a world where digital interactions increasingly define shopping behavior, social commerce constructs provide the blueprint for effective engagement. They help explain why some products go viral, why specific influencers inspire immediate Trust, and why consumers feel confident making purchases directly through a social media feed. More importantly, they reveal how brands can build sustainable digital strategies. For instance, by designing content that fosters Trust, encouraging community interaction, offering meaningful value, and leveraging platform features intelligently, brands can create a compelling social commerce strategy.

 

Social commerce is no longer an emerging trend; it is a dominant force in global retail. Understanding its core constructs is the key to navigating this landscape with clarity, relevance, and competitive advantage. As professionals in this field, your understanding and application of these constructs can significantly impact the success of your brand or business in the global retail market.

 

Arman POUREISA

Marketing Manager

 

References

Agag, G., Eid, R., Lababdi, H. C., Abdelwahab, M., Aboul-Dahab, S., & Abdo, S. S. (2024). Understanding the impact of national culture differences on customers’ online social shopping behaviours. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 79, 103827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103827

Alalwan, A. A. (2024). Social commerce adoption: Examining trust, perceived value, and engagement. Telematics and Informatics, 87, 102132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2023.102132

Busalim, A., Hollebeek, L. D., & Lynn, T. (2024). The effect of social commerce attributes on customer engagement: An empirical investigation. Internet Research, 34(7), 187–214. https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-03-2022-0165

Chen, X., Guo, X., & Wang, C. (2024). Effects of social presence on consumers’ purchase intentions in social commerce. Journal of Business Research, 161, 113866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113866

Cheung, C. M., & Lee, M. K. (2024). The role of electronic word-of-mouth in social commerce: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Information Management, 75, 102691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102691

ElSayad, G. (2024). Influencer marketing, social commerce, and customer equity. Journal of Promotion Management, 30(7), 1087–1112. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2024.2347229

Gao, M., & Huang, L. (2024). Perceived enjoyment and attitude consistency in omni-channel retailing. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 36(3), 599–621. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-01-2023-0079

Gao, Y., Liu, F., & Luo, C. (2023). Social support, social identity, and social commerce intention: Evidence from online brand communities. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 22(4), 974–988. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2106

Grewal, D., Roggeveen, A. L., Benoit, S., Andrade, M. L. O., Wetzels, R., & Wetzels, M. (2025). A new era of technology-infused retailing. Journal of Business Research, 188, 115095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115095

Gvili, Y., & Levy, S. (2023). I share, therefore I trust: eWOM engagement and social commerce. Journal of Business Research, 166, 114131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114131

Han, M. C. (2023). The impact of checkout button design on social commerce impulse buying. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 74, 103431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103431

Herzallah, D., Liébana-Cabanillas, F., & Muñoz-Leiva, F. (2024). Motivation and purchase intention toward Instagram commerce. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 17(3), 381–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2024.2308557

Houshiarian, R., Amidi, A., & Nameghi, E. N. M. (2024). Customer behavior on Instagram to enhance online sale. Journal of Modelling in Management, 19(6), 2061–2078. https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-02-2024-0059

Hsiao, Y.-H., & Lin, Y.-Y. (2025). How influencer characteristics shape purchase intention on Instagram. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 85, 104285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104285

Kakkar, A., Kalia, P., Panesar, A., & Sood, R. (2025). Trust, quality, and technology in s-commerce adoption. Aslib Journal of Information Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-09-2024-0764

Khan, F. A., Singh, N., Sethi, V. A., Chandra, P. K., & Kreem, H. (2025). Influencer engagement via Instagram. In Data Analytics and Influencer Marketing (pp. 255–268). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-7773-4.ch012

Liu, Y., Shan, B., & Zhang, R. (2023). Social presence and trust in livestream commerce. Computers in Human Behavior, 140, 107591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107591

Patwa, N., Gupta, M., & Mittal, A. (2024). Online communities and social commerce. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-01-2023-0014

Sadiq, S., Kaiwei, J., Aman, I., & Mansab, M. (2025). AI and behavioral intention in social commerce adoption. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 31(1), 100268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2024.100268

Tandon, A., Dhir, A., Kaur, P., & Mäntymäki, M. (2023). Dark and bright sides of social commerce: A systematic review. Journal of Business Research, 157, 113694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113694

Ventre, I., & Kolbe, D. (2024). Consumer interaction on Instagram and Facebook: Impact on social commerce. International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 35(1), 22–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593969.2024.2347942

Wang, X., Lin, X., Zhang, C., & Macias, J. (2024). Establishing consumer trust in social commerce. Journal of Computer Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2024.2364257

Zhang, K. Z., Zhao, S. J., Cheung, C. M., & Lee, M. K. (2023). Consumer participation in social commerce: The role of social identity and perceived value. Information & Management, 60(3), 103770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2022.103770

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page