Why a Lighting Designer Sets the Mood
- Raffles Jakarta
- 2 hours ago
- 10 min read
In 2002, a publication in Science validated a finding that challenged three hundred years of beliefs regarding ocular function. In addition to the rods and cones responsible for vision, the human retina houses a third category of photoreceptor that does not contribute to sight. It regulates the biological clock. That revelation transitioned lighting design from mere ornamentation to the realm of physiology.
A designer determining lighting is now influencing alertness, circadian rhythms, and hormonal secretion, in addition to the esthetic of a space. Comprehending both roles and candidly acknowledging the boundaries of our knowledge is what the field currently demands.
Why does a Lighting Designer sets the mood?
A lighting designer sets mood because light acts on two separate systems at once. The visual system produces perceptions of brightness, contrast, color, and form, which determine how a space feels aesthetically.
A separate nonvisual pathway, mediated by melanopsin-containing retinal ganglion cells discovered around the turn of the century, regulates circadian rhythm, alertness, and neuroendocrine function. Because these two systems have different spectral sensitivities, a room can be perfectly lit for seeing and poorly lit for the body, or the reverse.
The designer's job is to serve both, using measures such as melanopic equivalent daylight illuminance alongside conventional visual criteria.
The discovery that changed the field
The series is valuable to understand due to its recency. In 1999, studies revealed that the regulation of the mammalian pineal gland was mediated by ocular photoreceptors distinct from rods and cones (Lucas, Freedman, Munoz, Garcia Fernandez, & Foster, 1999).
In the year 2000, a new photopigment known as melanopsin was discovered (Provencio et al., 2000). In 2001, an action spectrum demonstrating melatonin regulation in humans offered proof of a new circadian photoreceptor (Brainard et al., 2001).
In 2002, Berson, Dunn, and Takao illustrated phototransduction by retinal ganglion cells that regulate the circadian clock (Berson, Dunn, & Takao, 2002). These cells are referred to as intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells. Their maximum sensitivity is in the short wavelength range near 480 nanometers, within the blue to green section of the spectrum, with minimal response at the red end (Goodlight Group, 2022). That solitary fact establishes the primary challenge for illumination design.
The visual system is more sensitive to green and yellow wavelengths, and the units lux and lumen are based on how responsive long- and medium-wavelength cones are. Consequently, those units delineate the perceptions of a typical observer and are unsuitable for measuring non-visual reactions (Goodlight Group, 2022).
Two rooms may exhibit identical lux measurements yet produce markedly different biological impacts.
A second measuring system
The field addressed this issue by developing a parallel metrology system. An initial approach introduced equivalent melanopic lux in 2014 (Lucas et al., 2014).
The International Commission on Illumination then formalized the system, with modifications, as an international standard, CIE S 026, published in 2018, providing a way to quantify optical radiation for responses influenced by these photoreceptors (International Commission on Illumination, 2018).
The working quantity is melanopic equivalent daylight illuminance, usually abbreviated as melanopic EDI. It expresses the illuminance of daylight that would produce the same melanopic effect as the light being measured (Schlangen & Price, 2021).
Meta-analyses have found melanopic illuminance to be the best available single predictor of human circadian responses (Brown, 2020).
The numbers a designer can actually use
In 2022, a consensus among experts was released in PLOS Biology by eighteen researchers specializing in lighting, photometry, sleep, and circadian science, subsequent to the Second International Workshop on Circadian and Neurophysiological Photometry (Brown et al., 2022). The primary daytime suggestion is particular. During daylight hours, it is advised that the minimum melanopic EDI is 250 lux, assessed at the eye level in the vertical plane, approximately 1.2 meters high, which aligns with the vertical illuminance at eye level for an individual seated (Goodlight Group, 2022; Brown et al., 2022).
Three specifics render the proposal truly practical instead of theoretical. It is assessed at the eye level, rather than on the desk, representing a distinct measurement from the horizontal illuminance commonly referenced in specifications. It is oriented vertically, indicating what confronts a forward-facing surface.
The guidelines establish significantly reduced objectives for evening activities and even lower for the sleep setting, as the same process that enhances daytime alertness interferes with nocturnal rest (Brown et al., 2022). The authors meticulously positioned these as supplementary instead of overriding, emphasizing that they are not meant to substitute current recommendations on visual performance, comfort, and energy usage (Goodlight Group, 2022).
Colour temperature is the wrong shortcut
A prevalent practice warrants rectification, as nearly every specification document contains it. Investigations have conventionally utilized correlated color temperature as an indicator of biological impact, based on the premise that bluer light is associated with elevated Kelvin values. Correlated color temperature has proven to be an insufficient substitute for the biological impacts of light, as melanopic EDI corresponds more accurately with the melanopsin reaction (Gagné, Turgeon, Jomphe, Demers, & Hébert, 2024).
Two light sources with identical color temperatures can exhibit significantly varied melanopic content based on their spectral power distribution. Indicating 4000 Kelvin conveys information about appearance but gives little insight into physiology.
The honest counterweight
An article portraying this domain as resolved would be deceptive, and professionals ought to be aware of the existing controversies. A frequently referenced study inquired explicitly if human-centric lighting is a myth, magic, or metaphor, analyzing the disparity between promotional assertions and empirical evidence (Houser, Boyce, Zeitzer, & Herf, 2021).
The apprehension is valid: the commercial zeal for circadian lighting has outpaced the evidence provided by field studies. Analyzes of empirical field studies have determined that the correlation between actual dynamic or personal light exposure and circadian phase, mood, task performance, and physiological metrics is variable, with numerous studies employing photopic illuminance instead of melanopic EDI as their light measurement.
Despite the established consensus recommendation, the current findings are still too variable to be deemed validated, necessitating additional research in both laboratory and field settings (Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2025).
There exists a tangible challenge. Attaining a melanopic EDI of 250 lux at the eye necessitates significantly stricter criteria than standard illuminance benchmarks, and investigations into office daylighting reveal that reconciling circadian stimulation with glare mitigation is difficult, as expansive windows providing sufficient melanopic light may induce discomfort (Ticleanu, Flores Villa, Littlefair, & Howlett, 2025). The tenable argument is that the mechanism is firmly established, the metric is standardized, the daytime objective is a sensible design aim, and the asserted downstream advantages warrant due prudence.
The visual craft has not gone anywhere
None of this supplants conventional expertise; a designer who prioritizes only melanopic elements creates environments that are undesirable to inhabit. The ambiance in a conventional context is generated through contrast, distribution, and shading.
A consistently illuminated room appears institutional irrespective of its spectral makeup. The combination of ambient, task, and accent lighting generates the diversity that renders a space comprehensible and inviting. Glare management influences the perception of a luminous setting as either welcoming or antagonistic.
Color rendering influences the accurate depiction of materials, food, and skin tones. Orientation and shading provide structure to items and dimensionality to a space. These are evaluative and esthetic assessments developed through experience, and they constitute the predominant aspect of the field.
Circadian science introduces an additional set of criteria that a robust scheme must fulfill, rather than supplanting the initial criteria.
What this means in Jakarta
Indonesia's stance establishes a distinct and somewhat atypical scenario. Equatorial sunlight is plentiful, uniform, and intensely bright year-round, featuring approximately twelve hours of daylight and negligible seasonal fluctuations. In theory, this facilitates the attainment of the daytime melanopic objective more readily than in higher latitude regions, where studies on meeting circadian goals have primarily concentrated on largely overcast environments (Ticleanu et al., 2025).
In reality, the challenge is quite the opposite. Thermal influx necessitates the implementation of tinted glass, extensive overhangs, and minimal apertures, whereas the financial aspects of air conditioning promote the use of enclosed, expansive floor plans.
The outcome is that an individual may reside in one of the most luminous locations on the planet yet endure work hours in illumination levels significantly lower than their physiological requirements due to the building's design aimed at blocking sunlight. That strain is the primary challenge for interior designers operating in tropical environments.
Acknowledging illumination while omitting thermal energy and managing glare presents a design challenge with viable solutions, such as light shelves, reflective ceilings, regulated skylights, and strategic orientation; however, it necessitates an individual who comprehends that natural light serves a biological role beyond mere visibility and energy conservation.
What the discipline requires
Lighting design occupies a space at the intersection of physics, physiology, and esthetics. It necessitates proficiency in photometry, spectral power distribution, and contemporary melanopic measurements. It necessitates comprehension of human perception and biological principles, as the complete body of evidence originates from vision science and chronobiology.
It necessitates spatial and material discernment, as light becomes perceptible solely upon contacting a surface, which is selected by the interior designer. It necessitates analytical reading, considering the extensive commercial assertions prevalent in this domain.
Pursuing interior design in conjunction with psychology, digital media design, and visual communication design fosters a synergy that links spatial choices to perception and the documentation and communication of a design scheme (Raffles Jakarta, 2026a; Raffles Jakarta, 2026b). Instructing by practicing professionals is significant due to the considerable evolution of standards and metrics over the last ten years (Raffles Jakarta, 2026c), and the industrial attachment facilitated by the Center of Professional Development immerses students in actual environments where measurement supersedes conjecture (Raffles Jakarta, 2026d).
The essence is that a lighting designer creates ambiance in two concurrent ways. The ambiance of a room is created through contrast, color, and shadow and is assessed visually. The alternative is a physiological condition, generated by wavelengths that the eye scarcely perceives and quantified in units that most specifications continue to overlook.
Executing the initial task proficiently has consistently been the art. Engaging in both activities is the prevailing norm.
Frequently Asked Questions
How does light affect people beyond vision?
This effect occurs via a third category of photoreceptor within the retina, which is separate from rods and cones. Investigations conducted from 1999 to 2002 discovered retinal ganglion cells containing melanopsin that govern the circadian rhythm instead of facilitating vision. These cells affect the timing of sleep, levels of alertness, hormone secretion, and cognitive abilities.
Why is lux not sufficient for measuring healthy light?
Lux and lumens are determined by the spectral sensitivity of the cones responsible for vision, which is maximized in the green and yellow spectra.
The non-visual photoreceptors exhibit maximum sensitivity at approximately 480 nanometers in the blue to green spectrum, showing negligible reactions to red. Two rooms may exhibit identical lux measurements yet yield disparate biological outcomes.
What is melanopic EDI?
Melanopic equivalent daylight illuminance is a standardized metric that quantifies the daylight illuminance necessary to elicit an equivalent response in melanopsin-containing photoreceptors to the assessed light.
It was established in the international standard CIE S 026, released in 2018, and meta-analyses have determined it to be the most effective predictor of human circadian reactions.
How much light do people need during the day?
A professional agreement released in 2022 advocates for a minimum melanopic EDI of 250 lux during daylight, assessed at the eye in the vertical plane at roughly 1.2 meters in height, aligning with the eye level of a seated individual. The identical recommendations establish significantly reduced objectives for nighttime and the sleeping surroundings.
Is color temperature a useful guide to healthy lighting?
Negative. Correlated color temperature has proven to be an insufficient indicator of biological effects, as two light sources with identical color temperatures may emit significantly different melanopic content based on their spectral distribution.
Melanopic EDI corresponds more accurately with the genuine photoreceptor reaction.
Is the science of circadian lighting settled?
The methodology and measurement criteria are firmly established, yet the asserted downstream advantages require caution. Analyzes of field studies have revealed that the correlation between actual light exposure and circadian phase, mood, and performance is inconsistent, with a frequently referenced paper challenging the validity of claims regarding human-centric lighting. Additional verification in both laboratory and field settings remains necessary.
Marketing Manager
References
Berson, D. M., Dunn, F. A., & Takao, M. (2002). Phototransduction by retinal ganglion cells that set the circadian clock. Science, 295(5557), 1070 to 1073. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1067262
Brainard, G. C., Hanifin, J. P., Greeson, J. M., Byrne, B., Glickman, G., Gerner, E., & Rollag, M. D. (2001). Action spectrum for melatonin regulation in humans: Evidence for a novel circadian photoreceptor. Journal of Neuroscience, 21(16), 6405 to 6412. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-16-06405.2001
Brown, T. M. (2020). Melanopic illuminance defines the magnitude of human circadian light responses under a wide range of conditions. Journal of Pineal Research, 69(1), e12655. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpi.12655
Brown, T. M., Brainard, G. C., Cajochen, C., Czeisler, C. A., Hanifin, J. P., Lockley, S. W., Lucas, R. J., Münch, M., O'Hagan, J. B., Peirson, S. N., Price, L. L. A., Roenneberg, T., Schlangen, L. J. M., Skene, D. J., Spitschan, M., Vetter, C., Zee, P. C., & Wright, K. P. (2022). Recommendations for daytime, evening, and nighttime indoor light exposure to best support physiology, sleep, and wakefulness in healthy adults. PLOS Biology, 20(3), e3001571. https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3001571
Cain, S. W., McGlashan, E. M., Vidafar, P., Mustafovska, J., Curran, S. P. N., Wang, X., Mohamed, A., Kalavally, V., & Phillips, A. J. K. (2020). Evening home lighting adversely impacts the circadian system and sleep. Scientific Reports, 10, 19110. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75622-4
Gagné, V., Turgeon, R., Jomphe, V., Demers, C. M. H., & Hébert, M. (2024). Evaluation of the effects of blue enriched white light on cognitive performance, arousal, and overall appreciation of lighting. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, 1390614. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1390614
Goodlight Group. (2022). New set of recommendations for healthy lighting within indoor spaces. https://www.goodlightgroup.org/post/new-set-of-recommendations-for-healthy-lighting-within-indoor-spaces
Houser, K. W., Boyce, P. R., Zeitzer, J. M., & Herf, M. (2021). Human centric lighting: Myth, magic or metaphor? Lighting Research and Technology, 53(2), 97 to 118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153520958448
International Commission on Illumination. (2018). CIE S 026/E:2018. CIE system for metrology of optical radiation for ipRGC influenced responses to light. https://doi.org/10.25039/S026.2018
Journal of Environmental Psychology. (2025). The effects of lighting levels on the perception, performance and physiological responses in offices. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0272494425002877
Lucas, R. J., Freedman, M. S., Munoz, M., Garcia Fernandez, J. M., & Foster, R. G. (1999). Regulation of the mammalian pineal by non rod, non cone, ocular photoreceptors. Science, 284(5413), 505 to 507. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5413.505
Lucas, R. J., Peirson, S. N., Berson, D. M., Brown, T. M., Cooper, H. M., Czeisler, C. A., Figueiro, M. G., Gamlin, P. D., Lockley, S. W., O'Hagan, J. B., Price, L. L. A., Provencio, I., Skene, D. J., & Brainard, G. C. (2014). Measuring and using light in the melanopsin age. Trends in Neurosciences, 37(1), 1 to 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2013.10.004
Provencio, I., Rodriguez, I. R., Jiang, G., Hayes, W. P., Moreira, E. F., & Rollag, M. D. (2000). A novel human opsin in the inner retina. Journal of Neuroscience, 20(2), 600 to 605. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-02-00600.2000
Raffles Jakarta. (2026a). Interior design. https://www.raffles-indonesia.com/interiordesign
Raffles Jakarta. (2026b). Programs offered. https://www.raffles-indonesia.com/programmes
Raffles Jakarta. (2026c). International academic team. https://www.raffles-indonesia.com/international-creative-practitioners
Raffles Jakarta. (2026d). Raffles career development. https://www.raffles-indonesia.com/raffles-career-development
Schlangen, L. J. M., & Price, L. L. A. (2021). The lighting environment, its metrology, and non visual responses. Frontiers in Neurology, 12, 624861. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.624861
Ticleanu, C., Flores Villa, L., Littlefair, P., & Howlett, G. (2025). Assessing melanopic equivalent daylight illuminance in office spaces using a simplified approach for predominantly cloudy climates. Lighting Research and Technology. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14771535251317740
Zeitzer, J. M., Dijk, D. J., Kronauer, R. E., Brown, E. N., & Czeisler, C. A. (2000). Sensitivity of the human circadian pacemaker to nocturnal light: Melatonin phase resetting and suppression. Journal of Physiology, 526(3), 695 to 702. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.00695.x
