Why Is the Raffles Jakarta Study Right for You?
Most school comparisons ask the incorrect question. They ask which institution is the best, as if education were a ranking rather than a relationship. A school that transforms one student can quietly waste three years of another's life, and the distinction has little to do with prestige.
It is about whether the way a place teaches matches how a specific person learns and what they intend to do afterward. As a result, the useful question is more focused and honest.
Not whether Raffles Jakarta is good, but whether the particular way of studying here suits you. That question has a real answer, which includes the fact that it does not apply to everyone.
Why is the Raffles Jakarta study right for you?
The Raffles Jakarta study is for you if you learn by doing rather than memorizing, if you want professional standards applied to your work rather than academic approval, if you want to work in industry rather than continue your education, and if you are willing to be uncomfortable while you learn.
The model is project-based, studio-led, taught in English by practicing international professionals, evaluated primarily through portfolio and critique, and delivered in an accelerated format with four intakes per year. Research consistently shows that this style of learning outperforms passive lecturing, and it is appropriate for people who value capability over credentials. It is truly not the best option for everyone, and knowing which group you belong to before enrolling is more valuable than any brochure.
What studying here actually involves
Before judging fit, the model must be accurately described. Teaching is provided by an international academic team of educators who hold international certifications and have extensive industry experience, working as creative practitioners in their respective fields rather than academics alone. Instruction is industry-focused by design, with a stated commitment to professional excellence for employability, analytical thinking for problem solving, and creativity to foster innovation, entrepreneurship, and social responsibility.
Learning occurs primarily through production. Students complete practical assignments, live case studies, business models, and consultancy-style projects, present at exhibitions and student showcases, and participate in field trips to corporate offices and creative studios. All courses are taught in English, with applicants expected to demonstrate fluency, and those who do not meet the requirement being placed in an English as a Second Language program first.
The structure is accelerated, with four intakes per year: January, April, July, and October. And the campus is part of a network of 16 colleges and universities in 14 cities across nine countries, with opportunities for cross-campus exchanges, workshops, and competitions while studying. That's the shape of it: hands-on, professionally judged, internationally framed, and quick.
Why this way of learning works
The evidence for learning by doing is unusually strong, so it's worth knowing if this model sounds unfamiliar. The largest analysis of its kind looked at 225 studies comparing traditional lecturing to active learning at the undergraduate level.
Student performance on examinations and equivalent assessments improved by 0.47 standard deviations under active learning, representing a 6% increase in average scores, whereas students in lecture-based classes were 1.5 times more likely to fail.
The effect was consistent across disciplines and class sizes, with the greatest gains in small classes, and it disproportionately benefited female and disadvantaged students (Freeman et al., 2014). The accompanying commentary described the message as unusually clear in education research (Wieman, 2014).
A meta-analysis of 48 studies focused on project-based learning, which found a significant overall effect on academic performance at the primary, secondary, and tertiary levels, as well as across sample sizes (Balemen & Ozer Keskin, 2018).
For creative disciplines there is a further layer. The design studio is what Lee Shulman termed a signature pedagogy, the characteristic way a profession teaches its members to think and work, forming habits of head, hand, and heart (Shulman, 2005).
Donald Schön described the process as reflection in action, with the critique functioning as a working conversation rather than a verdict (Schön, 1983). Learning is produced by cycles of making, presenting, being challenged, and remaking.
The accelerated structure has been tested too. Research on intensive block delivery recorded pass rates rising from 74 percent to 87 percent and attendance climbing from around 40 percent to roughly 90 percent, with a later analysis finding the first-year fail rate fell by around 40 percent (Male, 2020; Jackson & Tangalakis, 2022).
A scoping review of 138 sources found 62 percent of studies reporting improved student outcomes, while noting contradictory findings on satisfaction and a need for more longitudinal research (Thomas et al., 2025).
The catch nobody mentions
This discovery ought to influence your anticipations more significantly than any other, yet it is seldom referenced in admissions literature. Scholars conducted a regulated comparison between passive lectures and active learning employing the same course material.
Learners in the dynamic classrooms demonstrated significant gains in knowledge, although they perceived their learning to be diminished. The adverse correlation was partially elucidated by the increased cognitive exertion required by active learning (Deslauriers et al., 2019).
A well-crafted lecture fosters a reassuring feeling of comprehension. Experiencing difficulty with a concise task, making errors, and receiving feedback fosters genuine comprehension, albeit accompanied by significant discomfort.
This is of paramount importance for fit. If you embark on a project-oriented, critique-focused program anticipating the comforting cadence of lectures and review sessions, the initial weeks may suggest that something is amiss.
It is not the case. It embodies the internal experience of experiential learning. Learners who grasp this beforehand are inclined to persevere through the unease. Learners who occasionally confuse emotions with errors and depart.
Who this study model genuinely suits
Several signals suggest a good match.
You want to build things. If your instinct on encountering a new subject is to make something with it rather than write about it, a studio and project structure will feel like relief rather than pressure.
You want professional judgement early. Being critiqued by someone who does the work for a living is more useful than being graded by someone who studies it, provided you would rather know now than be flattered.
Your ambition is industry, not academia. The model builds portfolio, network, and practical fluency. Those are the currencies of design, business, hospitality, and technology employment.
You want to graduate sooner. Four intakes a year and an accelerated structure mean earlier entry to the market, and earning, network building, and professional experience all begin compounding earlier.
You want an international frame without leaving Jakarta. An English-medium curriculum, a multicultural faculty, and a network spanning nine countries produce international exposure from a campus on Jalan M.H. Thamrin.
You are resilient about feedback. This is the one that separates people. If criticism of your work feels like criticism of you, a critique-based model is punishing. If it feels like information, it is the fastest way to improve that exists.
Who it does not suit
Transparency benefits all parties involved, including the educational institution. If your goal is to pursue a career in research academia, a predominantly theoretical university pathway with a definitive progression toward doctoral studies is more advantageous than an industry-oriented approach.
If your optimal learning occurs through solitary study and showcasing knowledge via written tests, a system reliant on projects, presentations, and portfolios will seem like a constant burden. If you are not yet at ease with working and presenting in English, the ESL pathway is available, but the necessity is genuine and should be anticipated rather than stumbled upon.
To maintain anonymity within a sizable group, smaller classes provide no refuge, which is both their advantage and their disadvantage. If you wish to defer all decisions regarding your path for several years, a program focused on a specific profession will require a commitment sooner than a general degree would. None of these factors diminish an individual's academic strength.
They create an alternative for them, and the candid response is that a different framework would benefit them more effectively.
What the market rewards, and why the fit question matters now
Fit is not only a comfort question. It has consequences. The World Economic Forum's Future of Jobs Report 2025, drawing on more than 1,000 employers across 55 economies, found that 39 percent of workers' existing skill sets are expected to be transformed or become outdated between 2025 and 2030, and that the skills gap is cited by 63 percent of employers as the leading barrier to business transformation (World Economic Forum, 2025).
The most sought-after core skill remains analytical thinking, followed by resilience, flexibility, and agility, then leadership and social influence, and creative thinking. These are capabilities formed by doing difficult work and adjusting, not by receiving information. The local market rewards demonstrable capability sharply. Indonesia's creative economy employed 27.4 million people in 2025, about 18.7 percent of the national workforce (Badan Pusat Statistik, 2025), contributing Rp1,611.2 trillion to gross domestic product in 2024, roughly 7.28 percent of national output, with more than half of its workers under 40 (Antara, 2025).
In sectors like these, hiring runs on evidence. A portfolio shows the quality of thinking and the resolution of the craft in a way a transcript cannot, and experienced hirers note that claims on a résumé carry little weight against visual proof (BYU Design Review, 2025). Research on work-integrated learning supports the same conclusion.
A study drawing on national survey data from more than 76,000 graduates found that workplace-based experience produced measurable gains in perceived employability and in foundational, adaptive, and collaborative skills (Jackson & Dean, 2023).
How to test the fit before you commit
It is prudent to verify instead of presuming, and the systems are in place. Open house events allow potential students to engage with the campus, investigate the design studios, and participate in workshops conducted by international academic teams, alumni, and visitors.
An afternoon spent in a studio provides greater insight into the suitability of this model for you than extensive reading. Engaging with educational consultants facilitates inquiries regarding particular circumstances, and for design programs, the portfolio presented during the admissions evaluation serves as a valuable exercise in critically assessing one's own work. Scholarships are evaluated based on academic achievement, creative aptitude, overall excellence, portfolio quality, and interview performance, thereby revealing your true strengths. Analyzing documented alumni achievements is beneficial, as it illustrates a variety of trajectories instead of a singular model: victories in international competitions in Milan, accolades during fashion week in Jakarta, established brands, and positions in corporate leadership. The correct response to the suitability inquiry is not fervor.
It constitutes acknowledgment. If the portrayal of studio work, professional evaluation, live assignments, and initial industry engagement resonates as something you have anticipated rather than feared, that serves as an indication. If it does not, that knowledge is also valuable, and acquiring it now is significantly less costly than discovering it later.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the teaching style at Raffles Jakarta?
Instruction at Raffles Jakarta is centered on projects and oriented toward industry, provided by a global academic team of active professionals possessing international credentials and practical experience. Learners acquire knowledge via hands-on tasks, real-world case analyzes, consultancy-oriented projects, studio activities, exhibitions, and field excursions, with evaluation focused more on portfolios and critiques than solely on examinations.
Is project-based learning actually more effective than lectures?
The evidence robustly supports experiential and project-oriented learning. A meta-analysis encompassing 225 studies revealed that performance on examinations improved by 0.47 standard deviations with active learning, while students in lecture-based settings were approximately 1.5 times more prone to failure, with the most significant advancements observed in smaller class sizes. A distinct meta-analysis encompassing 48 studies on project-based learning revealed a significant positive impact on academic achievement.
Will this way of studying feel harder?
It frequently appears more challenging, even when it functions more effectively. A regulated investigation revealed that pupils in active learning environments acquired more knowledge yet perceived their learning as diminished, partly due to the method's requirement for increased cognitive exertion. Understanding this beforehand enables students to perceive the discomfort as a typical aspect of experiential learning rather than an indication of incompatibility.
Who is Raffles Jakarta not suitable for?
Raffles Jakarta caters to students focused on industry rather than scholarly research. This may not be appropriate for individuals intending to follow a doctoral research path, favoring evaluation via written tests instead of projects and portfolios, lacking readiness to study and present in English, or wishing to delay commitment to a professional trajectory for several years.
Do I need to speak English to study at Raffles Jakarta?
Affirmative. All classes are delivered in English, and students are anticipated to communicate and compose with fluency. Candidates failing to satisfy the minimum English criteria are enrolled in an English as a Second Language program prior to commencing their primary studies.
How can I tell whether Raffles Jakarta is right for me before applying?
Participate in an open house to engage with the design studios and partake in workshops alongside academic staff and alumni, schedule a consultation with an educational advisor to review your individual circumstances, and assemble a portfolio if you are contemplating a design program. These enable you to evaluate the learning environment firsthand instead of relying on a description.
Marketing Head
References
Antara. (2025). Indonesia's creative economy beats jobs target in 2025. https://en.antaranews.com/news/396817/indonesias-creative-economy-beats-jobs-target-in-2025
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2025). BPS: Creative economy employs 27.4 million workers in 2025. https://www.bps.go.id/en/news/2025/11/17/805/bps--creative-economy-employs-27-4-million-workers-in-2025.html
Balemen, N., & Ozer Keskin, M. (2018). The effectiveness of project based learning on science education: A meta analysis search. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences. https://doaj.org/article/1dbda68cde1749eaaa01c84817a08be2
BYU Design Review. (2025). How to create a design portfolio that drastically improves your job prospects. https://www.designreview.byu.edu/collections/how-to-create-a-design-portfolio-that-drastically-improves-your-job-prospects
Deslauriers, L., McCarty, L. S., Miller, K., Callaghan, K., & Kestin, G. (2019). Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(39), 19251 to 19257. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821936116
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410 to 8415. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Jackson, D., & Dean, B. A. (2023). The contribution of different types of work integrated learning to graduate employability. Higher Education Research & Development, 42(1), 93 to 110. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07294360.2022.2048638
Jackson, J., & Tangalakis, K. (2022). Uni fail rate falls by 40% with block model of intensively learning 1 subject at a time. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/uni-fail-rate-falls-by-40-with-block-model-of-intensively-learning-1-subject-at-a-time-176976
Male, S. (2020). Studying one uni subject in four weeks has benefits, but students risk burnout if it is not done right. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/studying-one-uni-subject-in-four-weeks-has-benefits-but-students-risk-burnout-if-its-not-done-right-132973
Raffles Education. (n.d.a). Raffles Institute of Higher Education Jakarta. https://raffles-iao.com/our_campus/raffles_institute_of_higher_education_jakarta/
Raffles Education. (n.d.b). Why Raffles. https://raffles-iao.com/
Raffles Jakarta. (n.d.a). International academic team. https://www.raffles-indonesia.com/international-creative-practitioners
Raffles Jakarta. (n.d.b). Our promise. https://www.raffles-indonesia.com/our-promise
Raffles Jakarta. (n.d.c). Business administration. https://www.raffles-indonesia.com/business-administration
Raffles Jakarta. (n.d.d). Admission policy. https://www.raffles-indonesia.com/admission-policy
Raffles Jakarta. (n.d.e). Raffles fast tracked programmes. https://www.raffles-indonesia.com/raffles-fast-tracked-programmes
Raffles Jakarta. (n.d.f). Open house. https://www.raffles-indonesia.com/open-house
Raffles Jakarta. (n.d.g). Frequently asked questions. https://www.raffles-indonesia.com/faq
Raffles Jakarta. (n.d.h). Alumni success stories. https://www.raffles-indonesia.com/alumni-success-story
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315237473/reflective-practitioner-donald-sch%C3%B6n
Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52 to 59. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20027998
Thomas, M., Muscat, A., & Marland, B. (2025). Building a picture of the block model: A scoping review. Journal of Block and Intensive Learning and Teaching, 3(1), 3 to 25. https://ibilta.vu.edu.au/index.php/jbilt/article/view/1357
Wieman, C. E. (2014). Large scale comparison of science teaching methods sends clear message. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8319 to 8320. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1407304111
World Economic Forum. (2025). The future of jobs report 2025. https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-jobs-report-2025/digest/
